<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The HDTV, 720p, 1080i and 1080p jungle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.larre.com/2008/04/08/the-hdtv-720p-1080i-and-1080p-jungle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.larre.com/2008/04/08/the-hdtv-720p-1080i-and-1080p-jungle/</link>
	<description>technology, innovation and media</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: larre</title>
		<link>http://www.larre.com/2008/04/08/the-hdtv-720p-1080i-and-1080p-jungle/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>larre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larre.com/?p=25#comment-49</guid>
		<description>he he. I always read that... use 720p. But my brain is not made that way. I need to know why! In my case... I think 1080i from my decoder gives the best result. By the way, I have Discovery HD, and it is really a huge step forward from SD television. The picture is crystal clear, and  you really get the feeling of standing in the nature, not watching it on TV. But I must say, that U2 3D gave a more whow-effect than the Discovery HD did :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he he. I always read that&#8230; use 720p. But my brain is not made that way. I need to know why! In my case&#8230; I think 1080i from my decoder gives the best result. By the way, I have Discovery HD, and it is really a huge step forward from SD television. The picture is crystal clear, and  you really get the feeling of standing in the nature, not watching it on TV. But I must say, that U2 3D gave a more whow-effect than the Discovery HD did <img src='http://www.larre.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Benjamin Larsen</title>
		<link>http://www.larre.com/2008/04/08/the-hdtv-720p-1080i-and-1080p-jungle/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Benjamin Larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larre.com/?p=25#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I think Eyvind that you would do yourself a huge favour by switching of the geek-mode in your brain before starting to deal with this kind of stuff. ;) The rule of thumb is to choose up-scaling rather than down-scaling. The logic behind this is simply that downscaling by nature discards information. In reality a lot of people would even have difficulties telling a properly upscaled progressively-scanned SD picture from a HD source.

More importantly: from your normal viewing distance you wouldn't be able to tell the difference anyway, so why should you care? Choose 720p sit back and enjoy the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Eyvind that you would do yourself a huge favour by switching of the geek-mode in your brain before starting to deal with this kind of stuff. <img src='http://www.larre.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> The rule of thumb is to choose up-scaling rather than down-scaling. The logic behind this is simply that downscaling by nature discards information. In reality a lot of people would even have difficulties telling a properly upscaled progressively-scanned SD picture from a HD source.</p>
<p>More importantly: from your normal viewing distance you wouldn&#8217;t be able to tell the difference anyway, so why should you care? Choose 720p sit back and enjoy the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 4.401 seconds -->
